Now that REALLY sounds fanboyish. Not even "remotely comparable" oa capability? Trying to be as charitable towards you as possible, maybe you are referring to the most basic aspect of oa, which is simply "not running into things." Yes, the Skydio very rarely actually runs into things other than the thin wires and branches that no drones avoid well, and in that respect it is indeed much better than any other drone. That's why I'd say this relieving people from fear of hitting things is its greatest strength, which allows for shots that are almost impossible to achieve by other drones. But oa involves more than just not hitting things. How smoothly does the drone avoid objects? What route does it take? How well does it keep the subject centered in the frame? How often does it just stop, unable to find a way through the obstacles? It is with regard to these kinds of things that the Skydio quite often performs worse than drones such as the m2 pro. Ive seen many, many Skydio tracking videos where the drone is very restless and jerky and the subject is bouncing all over the frame, and many, many videos in forested areas where the drone makes poor decisions as to how to avoid objects and ends up hung up in the canopy. Meanwhile I've seen many other videos in similar situations where a drone such as the m2p tracks and avoids objects much more smoothly while keeping the subject nicely centered, while also making better decisions on the path to take. And so far the Air 2 seems even better than the m2p with this kind of thing. So overall, I don't think its reasonable to say the Skydio's oa is vastly superior. Vastly superior at not hitting things going at high speed sideways or backwards, sure. But not vastly superior overall. So, given the Air 2's much better price, battery life, range, manual flying, etc., the Skydio's oa doesn't trump everything unless your main use is for high speed tracking.